Abstract
This article describes safeguards for double-blind review, conflicts of interest, editorial independence, reviewer accountability, and transparent revision workflows.
Keywords
peer review, ethics, editorial independence, scholarly publishing
Article metadata
- Publish ID
- IROAP-C92F0D7A
- Journal
- International Research Organization and Academic Publication
- DOI
- 10.xxxx/iroap.2026.003
- Publication date
- 2026-03-12
- Volume / Issue
- Volume 1, Issue 1
- Affiliations
- Asian Scholarly Publishing Forum; IROAP Editorial Office
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Repository URL
- /journals/international-research-organization-and-academic-publication/volume-1/issue-1/ethical-peer-review-workflows-in-digital-journal-platforms
Citation formats
L. Nakamura; P. Dela Cruz (2026). Ethical Peer Review Workflows in Digital Journal Platforms. International Research Organization and Academic Publication, 1(1). 10.xxxx/iroap.2026.003
L. Nakamura; P. Dela Cruz. "Ethical Peer Review Workflows in Digital Journal Platforms." International Research Organization and Academic Publication, vol. 1, no. 1, 2026.
L. Nakamura; P. Dela Cruz. "Ethical Peer Review Workflows in Digital Journal Platforms." International Research Organization and Academic Publication (2026).
L. Nakamura; P. Dela Cruz, "Ethical Peer Review Workflows in Digital Journal Platforms," International Research Organization and Academic Publication, vol. 1, no. 1, 2026.